No announcement yet.

What do you need to create panoramic photos?


  • What do you need to create panoramic photos?

    Panorama photos are made via a process that involves either physically (if you are using film), or electronically (for digital photography), stitching a series of photos of neighboring sections of what you want to capture.

    Since I have no experience performing this trick with film, I'll stick to the digital side of photography. I would, however, love to hear from anyone that uses film, either negative or slides, and how to go about it.

    Also, since I'm not as familiar with the Mac or Linux software options, I'll stick with Windows based software recommendations.

    How to start

    This must sound obvious to you, but it is worth covering the absolute minimums:
    • The Camera
    • The Software
    • The Subject

    The Camera

    Any digital camera will do. That is right: no need for over the top, high-end, obscenely expensive professional camera to shoot panoramic views.
    Any point and shoot (P&S) or digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera will do. I'll not go into the discussion of if "the camera helps make better photos" or not, just suffice to say that as a beginner to pano making, if you have a digital camera, your are set to go.
    I happen to use a 3 year old Nikon D70s which by today's digital photography standards, is almost obsolete.

    The Software

    This is a little more complicated since there are many choices. Some free, some very expensive, some just for windows others for any platform.
    They all, more or less, do the same: they align the images, superimpose the areas that are common from photo to photo (much more on this later) and finally generate a photo that is a composite of all sections.
    I happen to use two tools:

    Autostitch, which is free, and can be found at
    It is simple, fairly quick and it uses the algorithm that many commercial products use.

    Adobe Photoshop
    Photoshop has a feature called "Photomerge" that does the trick for you. It does a great job taking pictures that are slightly misaligned and merging them into terrific panoramas. Photoshop is expensive, but it can be found at

    If you are curious about what other possibilities there are, try this link:

    The subject

    Any subject that it is worth photographing, is probably worth creating a panoramic photo of it. Scenic, majestic mountain views obviously come to mind immediately, but it doesn't need to be the only candidates: sports events, people gatherings, architecture are just some of the more common "targets" in pano photos.

    Besides these three fairly simple requirements, what other tools or equipment do you absolutely need to have? None! Period.

    Sure there all kinds of "essential" (essential from a vendor's perspective ... ) items that you could use to make your life easier, but these three are the only ones that you must have. As you start to experiment, you will realize that there are items that would help tremendously. I'll leave it up to you to decide if you "have to have it" or if it is just a "nice to have it".

    An item that most agree that is almost a must, is a tripod. Once I explain the actual shooting process, you will understand why they think that way. When I started experimenting, I never used a tripod. All my shots were hand held. Now I use a tripod and I couldn't do without it.

    There are also very sophisticated software packages that will create not just standard wide view panos, but also have the ability to create 360 degrees (cylindrical perspectives) full motion views. Others even give you the ability to create both 360 degrees horizontal and vertical views (spherical perspective).

    Next: How to shoot the photographs
      You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Related Topics


    • christo
      Digital Vs Analog
      by christo
      I have been a traditional 35mm photographer for more than 30 years. I have a large sum of money invested in cameras, lenses and other equipment, so I have not jumped on the digital bandwagon. I did get into converting my analog prints into digital and am very comfortable with PhotoShop. Most of the...
      04-19-2005, 03:45 PM
    • Frank Lopes
      This is a Rant: things I resent
      by Frank Lopes
      Having to pay US$5,000 for Nikon's best DSLR (D3), when their top of the line film SLR (F6) goes for US$1,600. So much for advances in digital technology...

      Having to know Photoshop (or PaintShop, or Elements, or Lightzone, or...) to be able to produce a good photograph. I wonder what...
      12-14-2007, 06:25 PM
    • ogee
      Scanning vs Digital camera for archiving photos
      by ogee
      Over Christmas I hope to copy a number of old family photos. I can either scan them or copy them with a digital SLR camera. I think I read somewhere (here or somewhere else), that using a digital camera and indirect light is consider the better option. Any opinions? And if a digital camera what would...
      12-16-2008, 02:07 PM
    • Frank Lopes
      Why you need a tripod
      by Frank Lopes
      One tool that I mentioned you didn't have to have, even still I keep repeating that I couldn't live without it, is a tripod.

      Tripods make your pano shooting experience much, much easier than if shooting by hand.

      All the reasons why one would use a tripod to shoot any photo,...
      11-27-2007, 08:35 AM
    • Frank Lopes
      Why this equipment for panoramas?
      by Frank Lopes
      When I shoot panoramas, the camera sits on top of a Bogen - Manfrotto 055XB tripod with a Bogen-Manfrotto 488RC4 Midi Ball Head using the RC4 Rapid Connect System.

      Why did I chose this tripod combination?

      The ideal tripod is light, solid and cheap. Unfortunately, and to...
      11-30-2007, 09:01 AM