If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to RetouchPRO .
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
In the 80's and 90's most hand retouching gave way to digital 'second original' image manipulation. 'High end' (powerful) computers were necessary to handle the large file sizes and hourly charge rates of £300 were the norm. At those prices the workload picked itself ie 'High end' spend products such as booze, cars, cosmetics etc. By default this attracted the best artist/operators and their work became 'high end'. Like a lot of things in the world of smoke and mirrors, it means something and nothing!
To me, high end retouching is a useful term. A beauty shot that has received high end retouching should look almost like an untouched photograph, but without any skin imperfections and with wonderful lighting and expertly applied makeup. Only when you compare the untouched original with the final version is it clear that there has been retouching. This is a totally different thing from a shot which has been blurred and had a bit of noise or grain added.
BTW, a professional photographer with 15 years of experience means someone who has been taking photographs for 15 years (could be as little as a dozen shots per year) and gets paid to take photographs. It says nothing about the quality of the persons photography.
Nice one repairman, I like your reasoning and answer!
If you worked in hand retouching can you give some explanation as to why rgb values go from 0 to 255, it's always bugged me.
Nice one repairman, I like your reasoning and answer!
If you worked in hand retouching can you give some explanation as to why rgb values go from 0 to 255, it's always bugged me.
But for today's industry, I think I would go with the Fraiseap. reason is simple. images should not look edited and your photoshopping should be creative.
In the 80's and 90's most hand retouching gave way to digital 'second original' image manipulation. 'High end' (powerful) computers were necessary to handle the large file sizes and hourly charge rates of £300 were the norm. At those prices the workload picked itself ie 'High end' spend products such as booze, cars, cosmetics etc. By default this attracted the best artist/operators and their work became 'high end'. Like a lot of things in the world of smoke and mirrors, it means something and nothing!
...and sounds better than the overused "the best".
BTW, a professional photographer with 15 years of experience means someone who has been taking photographs for 15 years (could be as little as a dozen shots per year) and gets paid to take photographs. It says nothing about the quality of the persons photography.
Each color channel (red/green/blue) has 256 levels between black and white. This is due to the image information being 8-bit in each channel (2^8 = 256). Computers don't count in ordinals, so 0 is the first digit, and you stop at 255.
0 = black
255 = white
Going to 16-bit, you get 65,536 levels between black and white, which gives much higher fidelity and more subtle differences between hues and luminosity.
Going to 16-bit, you get 65,536 levels between black and white, which gives much higher fidelity and more subtle differences between hues and luminosity.
-Scott
In fact 16bit in Photoshop is really "just" 15bit (from 0 to 32768). If you want to test it yourself set an eye dropper to measure 16bit in the info palette.
But the rest is 100% correct of course :-).
That's btw. also why 50% gray (128/128/128) goes to 127/127/127 while inverting (because 255/2 = 127.5, not 128).
A little off topic though ;-).
To the OP: many folks just describe their work as high end because they want to tell everyone that they'll deliver best quality.
If they're really doing is another question, but since this term is not bound to a test or something it's easy enough to call yourself high end.
Most pictures doesn't look high-end even thou they ment to be, because of the price. Many photographers would like to have high-end rtouched photo in 1 hour time. At least they would like to pay for 1 hour :-) That's why a lot of high-end called pictures are rubbish in fact.
In fact 16bit in Photoshop is really "just" 15bit (from 0 to 32768). If you want to test it yourself set an eye dropper to measure 16bit in the info palette.
Yep! Thanks for the correction - it's easy to get on auto-pilot and forget details like this. And if we go a bit further, most camera sensors are limited to 10-14 bits, so there's a lot of wasted 'space'.
Back on topic, I think the question has been answered by a few here... there is no official metric, so it's just words
Just curious if there are any real high end pros here who would be happy to confirm how long on average they spend on say a magazine cover or high end editorial shot? I'm talking the proper long laborious pore level, flawless skin jobs here. I've taken the time out this past year or so to learn the...
I want to compare my skill with the other High End Retouchers. So please guys post some link of the images we can call that "High End Retouched Images".
I am a fashion photographer trying to educate myself in high end retouching. I am in the tricky area between knowing a lot but not enough as I would like. The area where none of the courses seem to offer anything new and the only way to step up a level would be by stealing Steven Miesels diary and kidnapping...
I'm really surprised how to achieve this High End Skin look. Currently I jumped to Dodge and Burn Technique but I think they uses other tools and method also.
Comment