Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NCPPA Strips Photog’s POY Awards

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NCPPA Strips Photog’s POY Awards

    I have signed up for several news groups for the events section of this site --- but this head line caught my eye when I went through the E-mails tonight. I read the article with mixed feelings. We are in a very competative age for media "who has the best picture" and with the tools that abound I think that can lead to some "enhancements" on some peoples part.

    I for one feel that images I see in news papers and news sites should not be enhanced --- that is photography not photo art, enhancement or advertisements.

    Just wanted to get a feel for what you guys felt.

    Here is the link to the article:

    http://pdnonline.com/news/#1


    EDIT: Fixed some spelling.
    Last edited by TwinbNJ; 08-26-2003, 10:00 PM.

  • #2
    See before and after comparisons of the photos in question here (you need the shockwave plugin to view):
    http://www.poynter.org/resource/45119/done.swf

    I'm of two minds on this subject. Sure, I'd like to see unaltered, just-as-it-was scenes in news stories. But realistically, those don't exist. Choice of exposure, cropping, where to stand, focal length of lens, filters on lenses, and even which film used (or what kind of digital) will completely alter the image from what another photographer might have gotten.

    Heck, a simple "say cheese" or "you stand here and you stand over here" alters the image from reality.

    The images in this case seem to be more about exposure than anything else, and that can vary widely just in the printing. And, as the article points out, dodging and burning for news photos is a practice as old as news photography. I've seen several examples of Gene Smith's images before and after, including his "Tomoko in Bath" that won so many awards, and I've read his own descriptions. He admitted he would spend up to a full day dodging and burning one image. Dorothea Lange is another award winner that did extensive exposure work (and posed her subjects, to boot).

    Personally, I think this is more about papers' covering their own posteriors than it is about realistic portrayals. Reporters edit and reform their stories, otherwise we'd never read anything but interview transcripts. This is simply the visual equivalent. As long as nothing substantive is added or moved, I say go for it.
    Learn by teaching
    Take responsibility for learning

    Comment


    • #3
      What Doug said

      In the 70's we joked about the newspaper 'burn' used in some portraits. Messages are refined in lots of ways, as long as content isn't manipulated to lie I don't have a problem with it either.

      Comment


      • #4
        Personally, I think this is more about papers' covering their own posteriors than it is about realistic portrayals. Reporters edit and reform their stories, otherwise we'd never read anything but interview transcripts. This is simply the visual equivalent.
        Exactly!! Even though reporters are supposed to be "objective", that's nearly impossible and I can read a story in the newspaper (at least my local one) and tell you which reporter wrote it based on what content was emphasized in the story. There is no doubt in my mind that our "news" has been spin-doctored before we hear/read it!

        Also as Doug said, what about the "artistic license" that occurs before the picture is even taken? E.g., I took a lot of photos of wildflowers this summer in a very arid climate. The background was brown and ugly, so I started bringing a black board with me to use as a "backdrop". That helped isolate the flowers and made for some beautiful images. Now, is that considered "doctored"? What's the difference between that and putting in a black background after the fact in PS? Or what about all of the dead grass that I removed from around the flower that was distracting and detracted from the image I was trying to get?

        You might say, "Well that's different. You were doing an "art" shot, not journalism." But, the truth is, I was trying to capture what my eye saw. We all know that our eyes can be very selective in what they choose to "see". How many times have we taken a picture of a beautiful scene, only to look at it later and think "How did THAT get in there?" Are journalists trying to capture a scene as they remember it? If so, then it's entirely possible that removing a parking lot or removing overhead wires is appropriate and helps the viewer see what they saw.

        And when you think about how much "editing" can (and has) taken place in the "traditional" darkroom, I have a really hard time with the current "crackdown" on digital "enhancement".

        Oh, oh, oh.... that reminds me! What about all of the completely fake (er, retouched) images of models that grace our magazine covers!?!?! Is THAT not digital manipulation at it's worst?? (I'm referring to the effect on women's self esteem, eating disorders, body image, etc. - not the retouching work itself.) Don't EVEN get me started on that!!

        Jeanie

        Comment

        Related Topics

        Collapse

        • cyberphonics
          Do you judge by the befores or the afters?
          by cyberphonics
          Greetings all! Just curious about opinions on this and I figured that retouchers would be more familiar with and have had more access to the Befores than the general public who typically only sees the Afters.
          1. When you (personally) say that someone is a great photographer, are you basing that
          ...
          01-09-2011, 05:09 PM
        • John Newton
          David Hockney's "Secret Knowledge"
          by John Newton
          I just got a new book yesterday called "Secret Knowledge" by the artist David Hockney. I've only read through the first third, but basically, Hockney spent two years researching the last 500 years of Western painting. His hypothesis is that many of the great painters used optical devices,...
          09-04-2002, 02:21 PM
        • mellyrose
          NYTimes article: Looking Perfect, One Pixel at a Time
          by mellyrose
          I'm sorry if someone already posted this, or if it's in the wrong forum. I couldn't decide where to put it, and I did search for it first. I thought you would all enjoy this. I did!!! It's in the most popular emailed articles right now

          http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/technology/...
          04-27-2007, 08:21 AM
        • jeaniesa
          Hey Arura! (about travel in Viet Nam)
          by jeaniesa
          Hi Arura,

          I thought I'd move the discussion of VN travel over here so that we don't clutter up the Critiques thread with off-topic discussion. Anything goes over here in Salon though!

          Wow - 5 weeks to see VN! That sounds about right. I brought my mother with me in...
          06-14-2002, 01:28 PM
        • BigAl
          Tent on Malolotja revisited
          by BigAl
          I recently asked my students, as part of an Internet awareness assignment, "What is the significance of the 'Tent on Malolotja'?". As this image was discussed in an earlier thread, I thought I'd share what the students found.

          What I was actually after was:
          • what had been done?
          • you
          ...
          04-08-2002, 05:42 AM
        Working...
        X