No announcement yet.

Multiple scans

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Multiple scans

    By Sharon Brunson on Wednesday, May 02, 2001 - 05:52 pm:

    Doug, you mentioned elsewhere in the forum that you use multiple scans that can reach up to 75mb. What software do you use and would you mind sharing a little more about your scanning techniques? Thanks, Sharon

    By Doug Nelson (doug) on Thursday, May 03, 2001 - 10:20 am:

    My own scanning setup is woefully undernourished, so I've learned to make do.

    First, a scanner test:
    Scan something with a lot of fine, precise detail (a dollar bill works fine) into your favorite editing software. Use the highest-quality settings available (real, not interpolated), with no processing of any kind. Save.

    Now, scan again, changing nothing.

    Copy the second scan, and paste it into the first as a new layer. Save.

    Switch the blend mode of the new layer to 'difference' (this is a Photoshop setting, other software probably has a similar mode. It simply highlights any differences between layers).
    Examine in highly magnified mode. Can you see anything? It should be completely black, with nothing else visible at all.

    If this has been successful, your scanner has the repeatability necessary for multi-layer scanning.

    The basic fault of most scanners, particularly less expensive scanners, is that they introduce noise into the darker areas. This manifests as random lighter dots. They aren't the same from scan to scan, so if we switch the new layer's mode from 'difference' to 'darken', the darkest value of each scan will be combined, eliminating any noise spots that aren't accidentally aligned.

    Flatten, scan again, paste again, mode to darken again, flatten again. repeat. (I usually do four, but this is overkill).

    This is the most elementary area of multi-scan. Some higher-end scanners, particularly film scanners, can do this all automatically. There's a lot of room for error, but again, if you're stuck with what you have you make do.

    Now you can experiment. If your software allows it, you can do scans at different lightness levels, expanding the range beyond what most scanners can perform in a single pass. For example, in the tintype challenge, you could make a layer scanned to optimize for the stained area.

    These layers should be left separate.

    I have to stress, this whole procedure is a bad mistake if your scanner shows even the slightest bit of misalignment during the 'difference' test (someone please post what this mode is called in other software editors).

    Always scan at the highest bit level your scanner allows (many offer 16-bit nowadays). Since Photoshop's support for high-bit images is pathetic, use whatever tools your scanner manufacturer supplies to work with the highbit image before moving to the editor's tools, and don't convert to 8-bit until you absolutely must. This is particularly important in B/W images.

    I'll let people experiment awhile before I inflict any more

    Again, translation into PaintShop Pro, Painter, Photopaint, etc., terms would be appreciated.

    By Sharon Brunson on Thursday, May 03, 2001 - 11:57 am:

    Wow, I appreciate the detailed information. Can't wait to try it out. Thanks, Sharon

    By Sharon Brunson on Thursday, May 03, 2001 - 02:14 pm:

    Okay, I tried the difference test. I don't have a dollar here so I used a picture. At 300dpi the scan was completely dark but at 600dpi and 1200dpi the difference test looked kind of like a negative - everything had a semi-light outline. I completed your instructions on the 300dpi picture and it turned out great. How do the different resolutions change this? I am using VueScan software. And I have an Epson Perfection 636U scanner. Thanks, Sharon

    By LindaJ on Tuesday, May 08, 2001 - 09:50 pm:

    Sharon, I have Vuescan (Version 7) also. I notice that one can make multiple passes with it. I have used the multiple pass feature and it has helped my scans. Have you tried the feature?

    I wonder if multiple scans with Vuescan will accomplish the same as the above procedure? My scanner is an Epson 1200U.


    By Doug Nelson (doug) on Tuesday, May 08, 2001 - 10:05 pm:

    looks like your scanner passes at low-rez, but fails at higher resolutions. Any gains you might see would be lost by giving up the higher resolution. Try Vuescan multipass, it may offer an alternative method.

    If you try this with misaligned images you'll actually multiply noise instead of eliminating it.

    By Sharon Brunson on Wednesday, May 09, 2001 - 11:40 am:

    Hi Linda, I have tried the multipass in Vuescan. I did notice that Doug's method produced better results but I'm going to take his advice and stick with Vuescan's multipass since my scanner won't handle the higher resolutions in Doug's method. I bought my mother the Epson 1200U and I really liked it. Sharon
    Last edited by Doug Nelson; 08-18-2001, 03:09 PM.
    Learn by teaching
    Take responsibility for learning

  • #2
    Ok Doug,

    I'm not sure what you mean by "mis-aligned images". Are these layers that have noise in them after you change their blending mode to difference? Are we only supposed to flatten layers that are completely dark upon close inspection?

    You said, "The darkest value of each scan will be combined, eliminating any noise spots that aren't accidentally aligned." I've read this sentence about ten times and I can't get my brain to understand what it means!

    I'm so close to figuring this out . . . the light bulb is there--it just hadn't been turned on yet.



    • #3
      "Misaligned" comes from some scanners that just can't repeat the same precise scan twice (there's more than you think).

      As for combining darkest areas, that's a simple function of the 'darken' blend mode. Two layers combine, with the darkest feature of each showing. This is fine, unless the noise spots just happen to be in perfect alignment, in which case they'll just continue to sit there taunting you.

      Clear as mud?
      Learn by teaching
      Take responsibility for learning


      • #4


        Related Topics


        • KevinBE
          Silverfast AI
          by KevinBE
          Does anyone have the AI version of Silverfast? I am really getting into the LE version that came with my Epson 2450. I really like what I can do with it. Their approach to making the tonal corrections in the scan is really good. I also like the descreen filter, it really works well. Only problem...
          11-30-2002, 06:55 PM
        • Rick
          Scanning issues..
          by Rick
          Hi, all.

          I've recently purchased at HP4400C.

          The reason for this choice as opposed to the other high end models of this same make is due to the fact that there was no noticeable difference (at the store) in scanning. the only difference they offered were faster...
          06-25-2002, 04:42 AM
        • akj
          HP Scanner
          by akj
          Just wondering if any of you out there are working with a HP scanner? When I bought my scanner I was heavy into web design so I really didn't consider buying a high-output-end scanner--of course now I'm regretting this decision.

          I have a ScanJet 5300C and am reading all I...
          08-17-2001, 04:26 PM
        • imann08
          Oversized scans
          by imann08
          I may have to scan an image that is in the 25x21 area. I only have the standard 8.5x11. The one option that I know of is to scan it in pieces and then put it back together on PS. One thing I have read about that though is that you should scan each piece of the image in the same direction and with the...
          04-19-2006, 09:57 PM
        • grammaat46
          Scanner selection and setup
          by grammaat46
          Hi everyone

          I'm a graduate student who will be scanning in old letters from WWI soldiers as part of a project. The soldier's message is of course the primary concern but the aging of the paper and penmanship creates another aspect to the collection. I'm new to this and would appreciate...
          04-26-2009, 07:17 PM