Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Differences in scan dimensions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Differences in scan dimensions

    I was just experimenting with a heavily-textured print to see if any sort of standard methodology could be developed for removing said texture when I noticed something peculiar:

    I scanned the same image twice, using the same settings, the second time at 90 degrees from the first. I then carefully rotated them both so they had exactly the same aspect. Then I dragged one over to the other and applied difference mode for precise alignment. I found I couldn't align all sections of the image at the same time. It turns out one of the images was slightly narrower than the other. Not so much as you'd notice with a single scan, but enough to make precise alignment impossible.

    Has anyone else noticed this? Is this from the scanner, or from the rotation in Photoshop?
    Learn by teaching
    Take responsibility for learning

  • #2
    The scanner is a new Epson 3200. I'm still playing with this as I type this, but right now I'm suspecting it's something in the rotation.

    I did discover this one little tip for anyone trying this: for alignment scans only, and not for general work, scan at your maximum-rated scanner resolution. It's slow, sure, but at lower resolutions a one-pixel shift can be way too much for precise alignment, and once you have the layers aligned you can downsample to your normal working resolution.
    Learn by teaching
    Take responsibility for learning

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Doug Nelson
      I did discover this one little tip for anyone trying this: for alignment scans only, and not for general work, scan at your maximum-rated scanner resolution. It's slow, sure, but at lower resolutions a one-pixel shift can be way too much for precise alignment, and once you have the layers aligned you can downsample to your normal working resolution.
      EXCELLENT tip Doug! I never thought of that, but it makes perfect sense. I've run into similar problems as you're describing and usually just use Free Transform to get "close enough". It works OK, but given that I'm a bit of a perfectionist I'm always looking for better ideas!

      Jeanie

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      • imann08
        Oversized scans
        by imann08
        I may have to scan an image that is in the 25x21 area. I only have the standard 8.5x11. The one option that I know of is to scan it in pieces and then put it back together on PS. One thing I have read about that though is that you should scan each piece of the image in the same direction and with the...
        04-19-2006, 10:57 PM
      • KevinBE
        Silverfast AI
        by KevinBE
        Does anyone have the AI version of Silverfast? I am really getting into the LE version that came with my Epson 2450. I really like what I can do with it. Their approach to making the tonal corrections in the scan is really good. I also like the descreen filter, it really works well. Only problem...
        11-30-2002, 07:55 PM
      • Mhamill
        scanning a 35mm?
        by Mhamill
        I'm trying to find the right way to do this.
        I have a 35mm strip of film. I need to scan it so that eventually I can print it as a 8.5 x 11. I want to bring it into PSCS & manipulate it first & then take it to be printed. My scanner does do negatives but I'm not sure how to enlarge it...
        06-13-2005, 10:55 AM
      • Stella
        Scanning Heritage Photos
        by Stella
        I will be scanning in a bunch of heritage photos. In most cases these are the only copies and the original negatives are long gone. Some of them are in pretty bad condition. Some are very faded.

        I will be working on the photos in Photoshop, but what I would like at this time is some...
        12-13-2003, 04:40 PM
      • airubin
        Nikon ES4000 scanner
        by airubin
        I just got my new Nikon ES4000. It is too early to give you any meaningful comments as I’ve only spent about 1 hour of non-installation time with it. The Nikon techie suggested that I use as much memory as possible, so I upgraded my Dell laptop from 96 MB to 512 MB. I’ve been planning to do this...
        03-18-2002, 04:48 PM
      Working...
      X