Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

jpeg images

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jpeg images

    I work for a small, local real estate newspaper. Over the past year we have seen a dramatic increase in the number of images they are sent to us as jpeg files. I am a traditional photographer (35mm), but have looked into digital to some extent. As far as I can discern, these images we are getting are not being shot at the highest resolution possible. We do some resizing, and sharpening (unsharp mask at 200, 1, 15) of the images before we place them in PageMaker for output to a web press. More and more we are seeing realtors unhappy because the images don’t look as good as they should. Does anyone have any tips, tricks or techniques that we can use that would help out?

  • #2
    Christo, lucky for you that you are in newsprint - this is a very forgiving medium for less than ideal originals.

    Your output is probably 85 or 100 lpi - so with the golden rule of around 1.5 to 2 x the input pixels as output lpi you will need around 130-200 ppi in the image when used at 100% size.

    So, when you first get the image/s - crop a dupe down to the approx content reqd. Go to image/image size and uncheck the resample box so that no new pixels are added or existing pixels removed. Resize the ppi to 130-200 ppi as your tests have indicated whatever figure works best for this type of image content. The print size of the image will grow/shrink to accomodate the new resolution ppi size that you have entered. This is now the largest size that you can place and use this image without inventing new pixels (upsampling).

    Get the folk taking the pics to use the largest resolution they can. If this is not enough then they need a better camera or you have to invent pixels.

    Get the folk taking the pics to use less JPEG compression, and to buy more cards to write the higher res files to.

    For cleaning up digicam images, I would recommend this action set:

    http://www.2morrow.dk/75ppi/coolpix/actions/


    Regards,

    Stephen Marsh.

    Comment

    Related Topics

    Collapse

    • Ambrosie
      Image size - lack of understanding
      by Ambrosie
      I have been an infrequent user of Photoshop 3 for over 10 years. From time to time I become aware that I have never fully understood some of the basics. One of these appears to be the matter of image size (height and width).

      To do the simple jobs I generally use Photshop for, I don't...
      08-06-2008, 12:27 PM
    • vickatter
      size and resolution
      by vickatter
      Hi!

      First Question:
      I'm a little mixed up with the way I can increase a file size.
      I had to do a few posters yesterday and I needed a final file of 70x100cm in 200dpi. The thing is that the pictures that I was using were a little smaller than that, so somebody at the studio...
      01-09-2008, 04:12 AM
    • zbgump
      resizing and resolution
      by zbgump
      I have a basic question that I should know the answer to. I'm working some pics my friends took with their digi cam to be sent to shutterfly. These images are being shrunked down by quite a bit.

      My questions is, is their any gain or loss by increasing the resolution when I decrease...
      12-02-2002, 10:22 PM
    • Regez
      Resolution Issues
      by Regez
      I own a Canon 10D. I wanted to upgrade my camera equipment so I purchased a Sony model A100 with a 18 to 200 mm lens. I selected Sony because of the 10 MP, image stabilization, and the same size lens so I could use my existing filters.

      I’m having a problem with image quality. I...
      12-01-2007, 03:05 PM
    • Donamai
      Is resolution Stricly confined to a Screen?
      by Donamai
      Hi,

      I recently encountered a problem with a website designer. Fortunately I could see his point before I started getting a bigger problem.

      Ok, here is the situation. I always thought that I new about image resolution but I was strictly confined to the screen in front of me....
      05-07-2007, 03:27 PM
    Working...
    X