Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Glowing Pixels In Photo.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Glowing Pixels In Photo.

    I have a photo that I have scanned. It was taken with a 35mm camera. The scan looks just fine until you zoom in, and when you do you start to see these little glowing pixels on the image. I used the healing brush on the image and that did remove them.

    However, I would like to know what would cause them? They were little singel pixels. They appeared to be luminous, not as a pixel imitating a color, but a pixel that was functioning as a light source. Also, they were scattered far from each other, and not clustered together like noise would be.

    What would cause this to happen?

  • #2
    Hi Jimmy,

    Are you only able to see it when you zoom in closely? I might be wrong here, but if you can't see them at 100%, I don't think they're actually there. Sometimes strange things happen when you are not viewing the image at 100%. I've had images that actually looked distorted when viewing at other than 100%. And yes, the cloning tool did seem to be doing it's job. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen. I have absolutely no idea why.

    Ed

    Comment


    • #3
      Ed,

      It only shows when I zoom in. When I am in the normal viewing mode I don't see it, and the closer that I zoom in the more of those glowing pixels I will see.

      If I print the image with those glowing pixels on it, will it show up on the print?

      Also, is this a scanner only phenomenon or does this happen to any kind of image?

      Comment


      • #4
        How odd.

        I just got an e-mail notice saying that catia had just posted a reply in this thread; however, I am here and there is no post for me to view.

        What happened?

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi Jimmy, a picture would have been good...

          Does the problem look similar to this attached pic (400% zoom)?


          Stephen Marsh.
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #6
            Sorry, I posted something on hot pixels but decided it was not that relevant to your problem so I deleted it.

            Catia

            Comment


            • #7
              Stephen,

              If you are talking about those stray single squared pixels, then yes.

              The only difference is your stray pixels are imitating color. Mine glow, as if it were imitating a light source.

              Also, the closer I zoom in the more of them I will see. At 400% zoom I would have seen a lot more.

              Comment


              • #8
                Catia,

                Whew! That is ok then. I was thinking I had lost my mind.

                I thought, "Well, is it really there and I am just not seeing it?"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Jimmy,

                  I don't *think* you'll see it if you print the image. Why don't you print one, then look at it *very* closely? Then let us know for sure if you can see it or not. I still think it's a fluke that shows up at high magnifications. Whether or not this is unique to scanned images, I have no idea.

                  Ed

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I found a solution to this problem.

                    To you pro this wont effect the quality of your performance; however, for those of you who can't function if the photo on your screen doesn't look like the photo you scanned. Then here is the solution.

                    If I scan the image at 600 dpi then this phenomenon doesn't occur.

                    Presto! Problem solved.

                    Comment

                    Related Topics

                    Collapse

                    • Canna W
                      Rulers best in pixels?
                      by Canna W
                      I just listened to a Deke podcast when he mentioned in passing that rulers were better measured out in pixels. I have always used inches, and am wondering why pixels would be better.
                      07-19-2009, 05:38 AM
                    • doosume
                      Resolution Confusion
                      by doosume
                      Hi, I am new to taking digital photograghs(and this forum). I currently have a Hp Photosmart 620 2.1mp camera that I have been taking photos with and PS 6.0 that I have been practicing retouching in. I just received my wacom Intous2 tablet today!! I have no photography training but do have a web graphics...
                      02-10-2004, 03:16 PM
                    • AndyJ
                      Mapping out hot pixels
                      by AndyJ
                      Like all digital cameras mine suffers from hot pixels at long exposures: the longer the exposure, the greater the number of hot pixels. I'm wondering how I can 'map' these out using a masking technique perhaps?
                      Taking an example. If I want to capture a picture of star trails I would typically...
                      11-04-2003, 04:19 PM
                    • Cumbrian
                      Small Photo: Can a 1"x1" image be enlarged?
                      by Cumbrian
                      I have a Photo i would like to try and restore,but this photo is only one inch square.can i enlarge this in Photoshop CS2 to give me something bigger to work with,i hope i am in the right forum with this.Thank You.Cumbrian
                      10-09-2006, 03:49 AM
                    • synthetamine
                      Unexpectadly Damaged Low Res Photo, help/suggest+?
                      by synthetamine
                      Hello all, so I want to get into photo retouching, everything I see here and on the portfolios of photo retouching sites look RIDICULOUSLY easy to me. but then the first thing I get "in real life" is this LOW RESOLUTION SCRATCHED UP GRAINY PIC and I would like suggestions on how to deal with...
                      06-20-2008, 01:21 PM
                    Working...
                    X