Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on texture

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on texture

    am i stupid? my frequency texture workflow is resulting in blurry skin texture.

    what are the proper steps to do frequency separation? i think i might be skipping something.

    1. 2 layers - high low
    2. blur low at around 10ish? (same as you would use in high pass filter)
    3. apply bottom image to top image - add, invert, 2, 128
    4. set top image to vivid light
    5. WTF it's blurry! (i know i can mask the eyes and such, but still... wtf)


    i've included the original file and the blurry pos.

    original


    blurado (post freqsep steps)




    can anyone help with some awesome expert advice?
    Last edited by tarilynquinn; 12-13-2010, 10:12 AM. Reason: left something out

  • #2
    Re: UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on tex

    4. set top image to linear light

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on tex

      actually, your Apply settings are wrong too.

      Are you working in 8 or 16 bit?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on tex

        sorry, 8 bit

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on tex

          ohhh i see what i did wrong. i think

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on tex

            Originally posted by tarilynquinn View Post
            sorry, 8 bit
            From Sean Baker in the HPS thread:

            1.) Start with two copies of the image to be separated.
            * 2.) Working on the bottom copy, run the gaussian blur filter at the intended pixel frequency (same as you would input into the HP filter).
            * 3.) Selecting the top copy, choose Apply Image from the Image menu at top (Shift+Ctrl+A on PC; Cmd+Shift+A for Mac).
            * 4.) In the Layer dialog, select the bottom layer which you blurred in step 2.
            * 5.) In the Blending dialog, choose Subtract.
            * 6.) Enter '2' into the Scale box, and '128' for the Offset.
            * 7.) Preserve Transparency, Mask, and Invert should not be checked.

            * 8.) Choose OK.
            * 9.) Your top layer will now look much as a HP result, albeit a bit flatter.* Set the Blend Mode to Linear Light.* Opacity should remain at 100%.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: UGH! Freq. separation coming out blurry on tex

              Originally posted by Flashtones View Post
              4. set top image to linear light
              thank you for your help, its much appreciated

              Comment

              Related Topics

              Collapse

              • fraiseap
                Extended frequency separation
                by fraiseap
                I have been playing around with frequency separation using a couple of methods;

                1. Using surface blur to create a low frequency layer and using high pass to create a high frequncy layer and blending the two with linear light

                2. Using the Model Mayhem technique of creating...
                12-30-2010, 08:42 AM
              • P_fuzz
                this frequency separation you all speak of...
                by P_fuzz
                show me the way to it

                j/k, I was wondering if there is an ultimate tutorial on this tech, so far I only found some really poor elaborated ones on youtube.

                thanks
                06-16-2011, 06:45 AM
              • keliot
                Frequency Separation without the Contrast Group
                by keliot
                Hello.

                Is there a way to do Frequency Separation without utilizing the Contrast Blend Modes Group?

                Due to the nature of editing I am doing using standard Frequency Separation techniques leads to unpleasant ghosting/ringing/halo type artifacts that build up with every step....
                10-04-2016, 10:15 AM
              • anderson234
                frequency separation blur number?
                by anderson234
                Hi,
                I've been thinking about FS blur number for a long time, for now my understanding is that, before blur, I should zoom in enough to make sure small texture,i.e. pores, be blurred and larger texture not blurred. That means,FS not only separates texture from color and tone, but also separates...
                11-20-2017, 01:43 AM
              • gwlaw99
                Skin retouching better than frequency separation
                by gwlaw99
                but not as hard as dodge and burn?

                I have been using frequency separation to smooth skin with a surface blur on the low frequency layer. While this gives good results and leaves in texture on the high frequency layer, I was wondering if there is a an even better method without having...
                09-04-2012, 09:20 AM
              Working...
              X