No announcement yet.

The paradigm of visible

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The paradigm of visible

    I have just discovered what I am sure many know - I am afraid that I took Photoshop literally - with the clone stamp tool, the check box selection: Use all layers, does not mean use all layers (funny thing, words and there meanings), it means Use VISIBLE layers. I had just taken their word for it and never thought to check...

    So my mind wanders to wonder if other areas of Photoshop are treated with the same paradigm of visibility. After turning off the eye on a couple of layers, I created a new layer and selected it, I then went to Apply Image and selected merged, and YES - the image was the result of just the visible layers.

    So, now I wonder - are there any areas that Photoshop doesn't follow this paradigm of visibility?

  • #2
    could be wrong

    I could be wrong but, I think PS doesn't recognize a layer when the "eye" is turned off, so it would use all the other layers, the ones it recognizes with "eyes" on. Maybe the exception would be the difference between merging visible and down, versus flatten, but both do not recognize an "eye" off layer.


    • #3
      Depends on the edit.

      With apply image - the source layer in the same file can be invisible but it can still be applied to a visible targeted layer within the same file (or separate files I guess).

      For most operations involving a 'tool' or define pattern or whatever, the visibility would govern things.

      Offhand I would think that invisible items still being included as visible would be more of an exception than a rule.

      It will be interesting to see how this thread pans out.

      On a tangent - define pattern or snapshot in earlier versions does care about visibility, but does not matter which layer is targeted. So this is why select all/copy only does that layer but select all/define pattern will grab all visible layers (there is also copy merged to deal with multi layers).

      Stephen Marsh.


      Related Topics


      • chas18052
        by chas18052
        can somebody please tell me how to setup a layer to work on eyes without effecting other layers............screenshot attached...
        01-04-2017, 02:19 PM
      • gpeisach
        create and use of multiple layers in photoshop
        by gpeisach
        HI there

        I've been browsing the challenges section and noticed that many of you use "multiple layer technique".
        I'm a newcomer to the Photoshop world - could someone please explain what this technique is and how to use it? (or point me to a tutorial on this)/
        06-03-2004, 09:21 AM
      • Stecyk2
        Quick Question: Use ALL Layers or Just the Top Layer
        by Stecyk2
        On the bottom of page 74 it states to use all layers when using the clone stamp tool. On page 75, it states, "Making corrections can be easier if you apply them to another layer." Do I assume that the preferred route then is to use a separate layer and NOT use ALL LAYERS? I think so, but...
        07-24-2005, 08:38 PM
      • tcnjdeluca
        Dustspotting and Adjustment Layers
        by tcnjdeluca
        I am restoring a photograph in Photoshop 6.0. The original had lost much of its tonality. I used channel mixer to convert it to grayscall and a couple of layers adjustment levels to restrore the tonality. (and make the picture much darker) I then created a new layer and and clicked "use all layers"...
        10-21-2003, 06:37 AM
      • DannyRaphael
        Before / after merged layers don't look the same
        by DannyRaphael
        Running Win/PS 5.5...

        Final layer stack:
        1. Merged layer, 100% opacity, blend=normal
        2. Hue/saturation adjustment layer, 100% opacity, blend=normal
        3. Background (original image, completely filled w/pixels. No transparancy anywhere within the BG layer.)
        05-07-2002, 07:17 PM