Is it destructive? Like, if You are doing with 10px brush high and low pass both, is it really destructive? Is D&B better or there isn't really big difference? I'm quite new to this technique.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Frequency Separation
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Frequency Separation
Originally posted by SimonG View PostI mean for skin texture, will it be damaged more after FS retouching then D&B?
Thanks very much, searching now
------------------------------
Comment
-
Re: Frequency Separation
Originally posted by creativeretouch View PostEverything is up to your workflow and how precisely you work. If I need to be fast, I would use FS, if I wish to work realy precisely, I would choose D&B. You can also combine both techniques together ...
------------------------------
http://shotworldwide.comI agree, because I worked quite a long time on an image with super-small brush on FS technique, that's why I asked
as well as I used colour gels, so light is colourful and I tried to get rid of some things but that just was not that good-looking as I wanted, even if I tried really carefully
Comment
-
Re: Frequency Separation
With the FS you can still work in layers and edit it non-destructively. You can dodge and burn with a layer on top as you are used to if you want.
The FS just gives you the extra option to edit low/high frequencies separately (I usually find it useful when I need to quickly smooth skin tones).
With a regular FS there will be some colour information on the high frequency layer, and it sounds like that is what you had trouble with in your colourful image? If this is a problem, make sure you move the colour information out of the high frequency layer (I believe this is sometimes referred to as asymmetric split?).
Comment
-
Re: Frequency Separation
This is my FS technique with non D&B at 5-10px healing brush. Also, added some contrast to high pass to make it a bit sharper. Actually, does not look like destructive. Just some really minor things.
Oh yeah, thanks a lot, completely forgot that it can have some colour!
What do you think about this? My screenshot attached.Attached Files
Comment
-
Re: Frequency Separation
Here the images before and after
I was trying to achieve that dolly and vivid Mert&Marcus look but can't really say, what do you think< retouchpro-ers?
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by drodeWhile I'm no expert on the technique, I use frequency separation regularly bu I have no clue what asymmetric frequency separation is or how I might make use of it.
Could anyone explain it to me or point me to a reference? Google and a local search here didn't turn up much that helped....-
Channel: Photo Retouching
12-23-2011, 07:37 AM -
-
by EedmonamHere is how to do a Frequency Separation on iPhone.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zxbxzzo4ss...Phone.pdf?dl=0...-
Channel: Photo Retouching
10-03-2014, 12:17 PM -
-
by fraiseapI have been playing around with frequency separation using a couple of methods;
1. Using surface blur to create a low frequency layer and using high pass to create a high frequncy layer and blending the two with linear light
2. Using the Model Mayhem technique of creating...-
Channel: Photo Retouching
12-30-2010, 08:42 AM -
-
by P_fuzzshow me the way to it
j/k, I was wondering if there is an ultimate tutorial on this tech, so far I only found some really poor elaborated ones on youtube.
thanks-
Channel: Photo Retouching
06-16-2011, 06:45 AM -
-
by Doug NelsonI've made no secret of my opinion of frequency separation during the RetouchPRO LIVE shows and here in the forums. I think it's a shortcut, and therefore a compromise. Good for assembly-line retouching of senior portraits maybe, but not so much if you're aiming for the cover of Vogue.
...-
Channel: Photo Retouching
12-22-2014, 03:09 PM -
Comment