Looking to buy a monitor for home use. Pretty much decided that I was going to purchase the LaCie 526.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...creen_LCD.html
Then the man at BnH told me that the Eizo Color Edge series is really great...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Collapse
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by Hartleyb4Hello - I'm new to this site I found it while researching monitors.
I am working as an in-house prepress department. I deal with a lot of 4/c books that are printed domestically and overseas. I am presently using a Mac Cinema Display on a Mac Pro Quad-Core 2.66Ghz box.
...12-02-2009, 01:48 PM -
by AdamZx3I am considering selling my Eizo Coloredge CE 24" monitor and was wondering how much is a fair asking price. It is about 5 months old, in like new condition and have all original packing. Bought from B&H Photo for $1700.
I really like the monitor but since I am finished with...04-22-2008, 10:23 PM -
by Jessie711Hi All,
I’m thinking about a duel monitor set-up for use with PS CS5 and have a couple of questions.
My current set up is a HP Pavilion elite m90402 with Intel Core 2 Quad Processor Q6600 and a NIVDA GeForce 8400 GS Graphics card.
The Graphics card has 1 S...11-30-2010, 08:21 PM -
by irishblueI'm currently using a 20" apple cinema display and thinking of upgrading to something better. I'm considering upgrading to either a Lacie or Eizo graphic LCD monitors. I notice on the cinema display, there's quite a bit of "burn in" where even if you move the image away, the mark is still...09-08-2009, 09:15 AM
X
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
No, not just launched. It has been around for quite a while.
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Originally posted by Damo77 View PostI have an ASUS ROG laptop, and its screen is BEAUTIFUL.
The whole laptop is beautiful, in fact. I've had it for many years, and it's still going strong. Whenever it eventually dies, I'll definitely be getting another.Last edited by manishbjain; 04-26-2017, 11:35 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Thankyou folks. This helps me to an extent but still not completely convinced . A lot of research leads me to believe that Asus UX501VW and Dell XPS 15 9550 seem good enough for editing and stuff as they offer close to 100 percent Adobe RGB but sadly both of these models are not available here in India. Macbooks are good but certainly the configs are not worth the price. Someone told me that macbooks even with such low configs are faster than others. Is that true. ?
Asus ROG GL553VE is what am planning to go for coz that I feel would atleast give me the speed if not 100 percent close to the display I want.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
I have an ASUS ROG laptop, and its screen is BEAUTIFUL.
The whole laptop is beautiful, in fact. I've had it for many years, and it's still going strong. Whenever it eventually dies, I'll definitely be getting another.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Originally posted by Tony W View PostAt last a well reasoned post.
My understanding of the basic Adobe requirements for efficient workflow is:
Accelerated GPU features using the Mercury Graphics Engine from CS6 (I think!) using both OpenGl and OpenCL framework. Compatible cards tested and listed by Adobe should offer all the GPU accelerated features below:
Camera Raw, Image Size, Select Focus, Perspective Warp, Liquify, Adaptive Wide Angle filter, plus?. These also use GPU acceleration via OpenCL, Blur Gallery, Smart Sharpen, Select and Mask.
Originally posted by Tony W View PostLightroom has its own minimum requirements and from CC/LR6 with 64 bit OS and OpenGL 3.3 and above. 1 GB of VRAM to 2 GB of VRAM suggested minimum (the latter for 4K monitors). From memory LR had issues with some cards (or probably more precisely the drivers) seemingly mostly those from AMD. In any case users were reporting that they had to switch off graphics acceleration other than suffer either complete failure or major slow down.
Originally posted by Tony W View PostPS 3D features will not work if your graphics card is not supported or its driver is defective
Originally posted by Tony W View PostNeither PS or LR use NVIDIA CUDA pipeline. I have seen suggestions that Illustrator does but never seen any evidence stating that CUDA involved, with NVIDIA just stating "NV Path Rendering, implemented as an extension to OpenGL, an open standard for graphics performance"
I can only imagine that Adobe did not want to get drawn into a less than open standard which at least on the face of it is the NVIDIA CUDA route.
Adobe did incorporate some of NVidia's technology into After Effects some time ago. As I recall Premiere used it for a little while as well. OpenCL is obviously more universal, but it took a long time to become really practical.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Originally posted by andrewrodney View PostWell at least the new MBP display is wide gamut (DCI-P3) and the entire OS and associated applications are color managed. I’ve got one, nice but it’s nothing like my NEC PA272W in terms of a high end color reference display, similar to Eizo. No laptop is!
As a pretty much dyed in the wool Windows user I just cannot understand what MS are playing at. Their latest incarnation W10 actually taken one step backwards by introducing/replacing Windows Photo Viewer (a colour managed application in Win 7 and 8) with an app. called Photos which is not colour managed and has caused the tearing of hair and the rending of garments in certain quarters.
Perhaps even worse is the fact that the old Windows Photo Viewer can be revived in W10, BUT - you loose colour management which was within the original Win7-8 version, unless you have upgraded from these. Therefore a clean install of W10 requires a registry hack to bring back Windows Photo Viewer into the colour management fold - go figure
IMO it is past time that MS should have implemented a better colour management rather than relying on others to include in their applications.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Originally posted by klev View PostWell gpu acceleration made its way into photoshop around CS5. CS4 merely added opengl rendering. Adobe went the OpenCL route at a time when that framework was still stabilizing, whereas a lot of professional applications went with CUDA. It was more stable and had NVidia's backing. They have since written a lot of stuff for it, much of which is machine learning focused (neural networks toolkits and other stuff that keeps popping up in tech news).
Lightroom didn't use any of this for the first several iterations, and at this point I'm not sure they have a reasonable plan/path to change that. We don't have any way of knowing what their internal architecture looks like or how it's laid out. GPUs are also quite annoying in some ways. They offer efficient parallel operations, but they typically have a high dispatch cost required to launch a particular kernel.
I am of course speculating on this, but I don't think the gpu will be a great factor for real photoshop use. It matters more for 3D modeling, especially if you have a high polygon count. It was easy to choke any notebook gpu the last time I touched that, which was a while ago.
My understanding of the basic Adobe requirements for efficient workflow is:
Accelerated GPU features using the Mercury Graphics Engine from CS6 (I think!) using both OpenGl and OpenCL framework. Compatible cards tested and listed by Adobe should offer all the GPU accelerated features below:
Camera Raw, Image Size, Select Focus, Perspective Warp, Liquify, Adaptive Wide Angle filter, plus?. These also use GPU acceleration via OpenCL, Blur Gallery, Smart Sharpen, Select and Mask.
Lightroom has its own minimum requirements and from CC/LR6 with 64 bit OS and OpenGL 3.3 and above. 1 GB of VRAM to 2 GB of VRAM suggested minimum (the latter for 4K monitors). From memory LR had issues with some cards (or probably more precisely the drivers) seemingly mostly those from AMD. In any case users were reporting that they had to switch off graphics acceleration other than suffer either complete failure or major slow down.
PS 3D features will not work if your graphics card is not supported or its driver is defective
Neither PS or LR use NVIDIA CUDA pipeline. I have seen suggestions that Illustrator does but never seen any evidence stating that CUDA involved, with NVIDIA just stating "NV Path Rendering, implemented as an extension to OpenGL, an open standard for graphics performance"
I can only imagine that Adobe did not want to get drawn into a less than open standard which at least on the face of it is the NVIDIA CUDA route.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Well at least the new MBP display is wide gamut (DCI-P3) and the entire OS and associated applications are color managed. I’ve got one, nice but it’s nothing like my NEC PA272W in terms of a high end color reference display, similar to Eizo. No laptop is!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Originally posted by Tony W View PostA decent spec graphics card is advised due to the fact that PS and LR can both utilise GPU acceleration and while at the moment only slight gains in future builds we can expect better?
Lightroom didn't use any of this for the first several iterations, and at this point I'm not sure they have a reasonable plan/path to change that. We don't have any way of knowing what their internal architecture looks like or how it's laid out. GPUs are also quite annoying in some ways. They offer efficient parallel operations, but they typically have a high dispatch cost required to launch a particular kernel.
I am of course speculating on this, but I don't think the gpu will be a great factor for real photoshop use. It matters more for 3D modeling, especially if you have a high polygon count. It was easy to choke any notebook gpu the last time I touched that, which was a while ago.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
You ain't bright enough to feed me in any shape or form
You are totally oblivious to the requirements of the editing programs you profess to use and stupid enough to suggest Bestbuy as a source for professional equipment - don't know about your country but no such store in U.K.
Of course I appreciate that you are not a pro user but you should really check your facts about system performance and requirements for Graphics programs.
Why don't you study a little more and present something resembling fact relating to software and attempt to refute the facts as laid out in post #5
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Let me feed you ego one more time by replying. Go to bestbuy, and lookup what's on offer TODAY, not 10 years ago. Then, come here and comment.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
What a pity you cannot seem to comprehend what is written and you reply with absolute bollocks missing the whole point as expected.
It is eminently clear that you are incapable of answering intelligently on any technical issue relating to PC's and you just regurgitate google chatter you have looked up.
Do not waste mine or anyone else time until you can provide some concrete evidence to support your crackpot views
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
I do not know about editors, maybe you should ask some 3D related magazine editors about that. But I am very involved in 3D modeling and rendering right now, and I know for a fact that a tower(especially with multiple GPUs) is a far bigger bang for your buck.
Editing is not what the Photoshop is for... you have Lightroom from the same family for that.
I'm sorry you got offended and need to rant, but you really have posted total crap.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Originally posted by skoobey View PostTony, please, NO PRO LAPTOP comes without an SSD. lol OR any laptop over 1000$
Cos my point is that an SSD is not necessarily the speed up that many graphic programs rely on (other than a fast one off start up) and further that laptops are not necessarily the best buy.
Any CPU is fine for Photoshop 2017, from Core2Duo onwards... same goes for graphics card...
IF 3d via PS being considered then you will find that without the correct graphics card that features will not work correctly.
OP clearly stated that he needs the PC to be good for 3D as well...
The basic suggestion offered of CPU, GPU and max. RAM is solid So show us any other professional 3D editing software that does not greatly benefit from a fast multicore CPU and a similar fast GPU and cannot use more RAM!
You don't need a monitor from NEC or Eizo...
all these guys working on expensive monitors and putting out crappy work, there are plenty good monitors for 500+ dollars,
and any current graphics card will support a typical 2k monitor (2560x1600).
Basically, everything Tony said is complete bull. Only thing that I absolutely agree with is that you need a separate monitor, whether you use the laptop as the main machine, or not.
Tony, why are you giving such bad or unrelated advice? I would not think you'd be the one to speak such nonsense. All those things would not make much sense 10 years ago, let alone now.Last edited by Tony W; 04-17-2017, 07:33 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Laptop Close to monitors like Eizo
Tony, please, NO PRO LAPTOP comes without an SSD. lol OR any laptop over 1000$
Any CPU is fine for Photoshop 2017, from Core2Duo onwards... same goes for graphics card... OP clearly stated that he needs the PC to be good for 3D as well... You don't need a monitor from NEC or Eizo... all these guys working on expensive monitors and putting out crappy work, there are plenty good monitors for 500+ dollars, and any current graphics card will support a typical 2k monitor (2560x1600).
Basically, everything Tony said is complete bull. Only thing that I absolutely agree with is that you need a separate monitor, whether you use the laptop as the main machine, or not.
Tony, why are you giving such bad or unrelated advice? I would not think you'd be the one to speak such nonsense. All those things would not make much sense 10 years ago, let alone now.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: