No announcement yet.

Picture Window Image processing/manipulation software

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Picture Window Image processing/manipulation software

    Doug, Picture Window is a image processing/Manipulation program from "DIGITAL LIGHT AND COLOR--( those key words will get you to their site). It is gaining a lot of popularity with the Astro crowd as the full version with all bells and whistles and the ability to handle the large bit files,sells for under $100. It is a useful adjunct to Photoshop and photopaint plus about any other image processing program you can name. It supports a great many formats and is fairly easy to learn--It helps to print out the instruction manual as no written one accompanies the product. Be warned it is 400 pages in length. There are 2 versions, PW pro (all the bells and whistles) and a "LITE" version which I think is kind of a heavyweight in its own right. I use it mostly for merging and special applications. Hope this helps. Tom

  • #2
    Link is here
    Learn by teaching
    Take responsibility for learning


    • #3
      Looks very interesting. There's a free trial version to download.

      Main liability seems to be that it doesn't support CMYK (no big deal for our purposes). Oh, and no Mac version (a bigger deal).

      Any other comments, experiences?
      Learn by teaching
      Take responsibility for learning


      • #4
        I published my review of Picture Window Pro here
        Learn by teaching
        Take responsibility for learning


        • #5
          Doug, Did you get a manual? I had to print mine out! Perhaps "pay back" for the free printer cable. The thing I find most interesting about the program is that, as you said, it leaves you no choice---you must think before doing. I use it mostly for Astrophotos but have been experimenting using it in conjunction with 16 bit hi res scans. Results are interesting and promising. Perhaps Adobe will take a hint from this little jewel. Tom


          • #6
            No, the manuals were PDF files, but clearly labeled so you can choose the subject you need (there's also one big one that acts as a navigator for general reading).

            The way the manuals were written was what gave me my first inkling of how different the program was from other editors, Photoshop in particular. Rather than being written by a team of specialists after extensive usablity studies, they're written by the guy that designed the program, and so reflect the same way of thinking as the program itself.

            I don't know the man, but I suspect he comes from the astro community, and brings this sensibility to the program and manuals. I'm also working on a review of a software package written for the medical community, and it also has a distinct point of view.

            It may or may not provide a better way of viewing images to a particular user, but its a refreshing departure that will make you think, regardless.
            Learn by teaching
            Take responsibility for learning


            • #7
              I found your comments about Picture Windo Pro very interesting, especially from what I presume is a Mac afficiando. I could not let this go, and must let you know who Jonathan Sachs is. You indicated that you didn't know him but presume he is from the astro community. Although he may well be, his greatest claim to fame is the author of Lotus 123. For those of us on the IBM side since the beginning, this fellow is almost a legend...correction, he IS a legend.
              Sorry for the tangential thought, but I'm such a neophyte on the real subject of this site, that this is all I can contribute at this time.
              Carl Laskin


              • #8
                That is no tangent. That's fascinating

                I'm actually 'from' the PC world, though I use any and all platforms with indifference, and I do appreciate the impact of Lotus 1-2-3. It was the first "killer app" for personal computers, and none of us would be sitting here typing away without its impact.

                I am glad I didn't know that before I reviewed the software. I'm not a professional reviewer, and I can't be certain that wouldn't have colored my opinion.
                Learn by teaching
                Take responsibility for learning


                Related Topics


                • Ken45140
                  Picture Window Pro
                  by Ken45140
                  Anyone here have any experience with Picture Window Pro? From the extensive tutorials and detailed examples and essays at the link below, this $89 program looks like it has many many features that I certainly do not see in PSE (even with Hidden Tools) and not in PSP8. I do not have PS7, but if all...
                  07-23-2003, 08:28 PM
                • harry g
                  Which software
                  by harry g
                  Hi Everyone
                  As a new silver surfer I am delighted to find such a useful site. I am inquiring about the best value for money software for reproducing photographs from the late 1800 to the1940s that are scratched and discoloured.
                  I have an e50 Agfa flatbed scanner (with 35mm adapter)...
                  09-08-2002, 04:07 PM
                • Vandrake
                  Which software for an ancient beginner
                  by Vandrake
                  Hi - my first post - hope I've got the right forum.

                  I need to "improve" some very ordinary travel photos for viewing by family and friends. I would also like to be able to repair photos of past generations of the family. Which relatively simple ( and it goes without saying...
                  11-18-2009, 05:00 PM
                • keren7
                  The final version
                  by keren7
                  After a very good critique that I've received in this forum I've made some adjustments and this is my final version (option I):


                  Please let me know what you think...

                  10-08-2007, 06:49 PM
                • DannyRaphael
                  Neat Image v2 plugin and noise reduction
                  by DannyRaphael
                  If you haven't had the opportunity to try the latest version of Neat Image (version 2, which includes a Photoshop compatible plug-in), it's sure worth a look. Results-wise, I'm hearing it's as good as (or better than) Grain Surgery for a whole lot less $$. For existing users of Neat Image, upgrade options...
                  06-23-2003, 09:45 AM