Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Plug-In: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

    I have seen several references to Genuine Fractals as the ultimate plugin for enlarging images. I purchased GF5 about a year ago and I don't seem to be getting the quality that I expected. I have read the manual and watched th tutorials and find any helpful information rather spotty at best - at least to me. Or am I just expecting too much from this software? To get a decent 24 x 36 print what quality image do I have to start with? Do I perform any resizing or sharpening to the image before sending to GF? I read somewhere to leave it all to GF. Once in the GF preview screen I boost the res to 300 and all looks great until I switch to the 1:1 view (which I understand to be the "true" representation of what the final print will look like).

    However, there have been times when the 1:1 view looked really awful, but I printed it anyway and it turned out to be much better than the preview. I am a little confused.

    Any insight would be much appreciated.

    Thanks a bunch.

    Rhonda

  • #2
    Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

    Manufacturers or resizing plugins will lie to you to get your business. The fact is, EVERY type of resizing will interpolate, making up information to add to your image that is NOT actual detail and resolution. Some of it may sharpen or interpolate differently giving MINIMAL visible difference. Minimal.

    What you need to print a 24 x 36 inch print and make it look stellar is a camera that shoots at least 5760 x 8640 pixels (240ppi). Though you may get away with 5200 x 7800 and 10% or so resizing.

    I hope that byte of reality helps!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

      Thanks Richard - camera info helpful, although most of my projects are from images given to me from clients or images that I have purchased for reprinting. I have a Panasonic 10MP camera that I have no problems with enlargements, but it is the others that cause me grief - I was hoping that I was just doing something wrong.

      thanks for your help.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

        I find that often what I get from clients has already been resized or processed. That's when I really run into problems. I usually have to go back and ask for the original file off their camera card. Even at that, many times they will crop or resize the image for their specific use and save over the original. Many clients don't have a clue.

        I've had good luck with GF. Managed to even take a 2x2 PDF of a line art logo and take it up to poster size 18x24 with excellent results. You can try boosing the PPI from 300 to 600 too. (mega file size and takes a while to compute, but this sometimes works best).

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

          Swampy,
          Line art, even at .001x.001 inches should be able to be scaled to the size of the side of a building as vector art is infinitely scalable and will not require interpolation. It isn't GF that is doing the magic, it should be the vectors.

          Dog,
          Likely you aren't doing a thing wrong, especially if the files supplied are not yours in the first place. People will mishandle files all the time assuming the resolution never goes away...and it does -- then nothing can magically put it back.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

            Sorry Richard... I wasn't clear the 2x2 PDF was a scan of line art, not the actual vector file itself. Wish it had been would have been a lot easier to open it in Illustrator and do the text modifications that needed to be done. :-)

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

              In that case it would have been better to convert the scan to vector and then scale. I have done that pretty frequently for that type of art.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

                OK, so thanks to both of you for your two very different opinions. I guess I will just learn not to expect too much .............

                thanks.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

                  actually, the company I work for just did a brochure for CES. One of the images, for some reason, had been saved at a smaller size than captured/needed. I used
                  Alien Skin's "Blow up" to upsample the image and you cannot tell the difference in the one that was "Blown up" two times the size and the other 1/2 dozen images that were used. This utility has saved us more than once.
                  ~Nancy

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Genuine Fractals ENLARGEMENT QUESTION

                    I have used Genuine Fractals for years. I haven't found anything else that does as good a job of upsizing as it. However, that being said, the following rule applies "Garbage in = Garbage out". You need a decent quality to start with. If the original image has less than 500K pixels you are wasting your time. If a larger image has been over processed, artifacted, or ortherwise distorted, your output won't look any better.
                    Regards, Murray

                    Comment

                    Related Topics

                    Collapse

                    • Sobe203
                      General Photoshop Question
                      by Sobe203
                      Whenever I do work with a photo in PS, it looks gorgeous in the program, and in the Mac application Preview. I can also upload them to ImageShack.us and they retain their quality.

                      When I upload it to Facebook, it looks blurry/shoddy. If I upload it to printing sites like Shutterfly,...
                      04-28-2007, 05:27 PM
                    • imann08
                      Scanning question
                      by imann08
                      I'll try to explain this as well as I can. Hopefully, it's not original to me. I'll use one I have as an example but this happens on all my scans.

                      I have scanned an image at 600dpi and then reduced it to 300dpi. The issue occurs even if I leave it at 600. When I show the image at 100%,...
                      07-24-2006, 07:15 PM
                    • joeman7
                      Printing At Higher Resolution
                      by joeman7
                      Hello everyone - I just signed up tonight for Retouch Pro. I have a question concerning printing resolutions. I currently use a Sony DSC-H2 digital camera, and it's default resolution setting (as far as I know the only setting) is 72 ppi. It's a 6.0 megapixel camera. My question is this: will increasing...
                      07-18-2008, 10:50 PM
                    • gblount
                      Question about picture size and resolution
                      by gblount
                      My camera, a Casio QV-4000 has several options on picture sizes: 2240 x 1680, 2256 x 1504, 1600 x 1200, 1280 x 960, and 640 x 480. I also have quality options of: fine, normal, economy and tiff.

                      When I open them in PS-7, the larger picture dimensions are huge in terms of inches:...
                      04-15-2003, 06:24 PM
                    • fotofreak
                      S-SPline 2 or Genuine Fractals
                      by fotofreak
                      I am in need of enlarging some prints and need to find some software that will do the trick. I have used Genuine Fractals and still find allot of pixelation when enlarging the photo. I came across S-Spline 2 and they claim it is better that Genuine fractals. I have tried it and here again the is allot...
                      09-09-2003, 04:11 PM
                    Working...
                    X