Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Calculate A More Accurate Histogram Icon"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Calculate A More Accurate Histogram Icon"

    I posted this on the Adobe forums and came up dry, so I thought I would try here.

    CS5 Version 12.0.4 Mac OS X 10.10.5

    1) The "Calculate A More Accurate Histogram Icon" in my Curves Adjustment panel is no longer visible.

    This may be file specific as I can open new image files and previous work and the icon is displayed and works as expected. Then there are a couple of files where it will not display. Currently I am only seeing this with some jpeg files, although 98% of my files regardless of type or bit depth will display the Calculate A More Accurate Histogram Icon in the Adjustment Panel when I create a Curve Adjustment Layer.

    2) As long as we are discussing this, does clicking on this actually recalculate the existing histogram to fill in any gaps or is it simply updating the view of the histogram from 8 bit to the actual 16 bit view assuming you are editing in 16 bit.

  • #2
    Re: "Calculate A More Accurate Histogram Icon"

    CS5 is no longer supported, so you aren't likely to get a response from Adobe. What's your actual question. Number 2 has an implied question. Number 1 is practically a statement. I don't know exactly what you're asking.

    As for number 2, you can always check by trying in 8 and 16. Updating to fill gaps wouldn't make any sense. It's not how a histogram works, so it wouldn't make sense to use extra cpu cycles for something that is basically nonsense.

    A histogram partitions the data. In this case each partition is a group of pixel values, presumably <r,g,b> triplets. The height of the histogram at each partition is determined by the percentage of pixels in the image that fall into that group. When you click the button for a more detailed histogram, it should recompute any partition that may have changed or at least retrieve the data (it might be updated by another thread in the background). There is no reason for photoshop to simply smooth it out. That would be a completely stupid approach for image data, and it would make the entire thing invalid.

    If you're really worried, check by making screenshots of the resulting histograms on 8 and 16 bits per channel. I suspect if anything, the quick previews are accomplished by applying the adjustment to a greatly downsampled version of the image. This is a fairly common technique in image processing. See mip map if you're interested in reading about that.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: &quot;Calculate A More Accurate Histogram Icon&quot;

      #2 just updates the Histogram to be more 'accurate' as doing so for each edit and move of an adjustment would slow the show down. So Adobe provides a sub sampled histogram and gives you the opportunity to update it from the full data based on the most recent edit.

      The Histogram can be useful and can be a huge waste of time depending on where you see it and what you hope it will tell you:

      Everything you thought you wanted to know about Histograms

      Another exhaustive 40 minute video examining:

      What are histograms. In Photoshop, ACR, Lightroom.
      Histograms: clipping color and tones, color spaces and color gamut.
      Histogram and Photoshop’s Level’s command.
      Histograms don’t tell us our images are good (examples).
      Misconceptions about histograms. How they lie.
      Histograms and Expose To The Right (ETTR).
      Are histograms useful and if so, how?

      Low rez (YouTube): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjPsP4HhHhE
      High rez: http://digitaldog.net/files/Histogram_Video.mov

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      • artofretouching
        Advanced Bit Depth Question
        by artofretouching
        I have an incredibly complex image (series) that is killing my machine. 13x18, ProPhoto, 16-Bit Depth with several Smart Objects. While I want to stab myself repeatedly with an exacto knife (changes are slow as molasses), i was hoping for a better solution.

        We know that 16-bit gives the...
        05-30-2013, 09:25 PM
      • artofretouching
        Why is CS5 default color mode 8 bit?
        by artofretouching
        Someone sent my blog a good question. I didn't have a good answer, so I bring it you.

        Why does Photoshop make 8-Bit it's default? While it does save the settings if you create a New File with 16-Bit, there does not seem to be anywhere that you can specify "Open All Images in 16-Bit...
        07-22-2011, 02:26 PM
      • Tony W
        Converting 8 bit images to 16 bit - any benefits?
        by Tony W
        In another thread I posted the following about my current belief and understanding relating to converting 8 bit files to 16 bit i.e. I doubted that any real benefits would be had and further that there may be potential to make matters worse by taking this course. Quote:
        When I started using...
        07-24-2011, 05:02 PM
      • Ed_L
        Reconsidering 16 bit
        by Ed_L
        I've been playing around again with 16 bit images, and I scanned one as such, then made a couple of levels adjustments. The image was duplicated, and the duplicate was changed to 8 bit mode for comparison. The exact same adjustment was made to each of them, and the resulting histogram showed voids in...
        01-05-2003, 05:16 PM
      • Dropt
        Another 8/16 bits question
        by Dropt
        Good morning everyone,

        As there is no small questions thread, I find myself opening up a whole new subject for a small question. Here's the deal and it's quite simple : My boss has given me a 16 bits camera file to convert in 8 bits, then retouch. So far so good. But he's also adding (quoted...
        08-31-2011, 03:50 AM
      Working...
      X