Simple, the browser isn't color managed. Without color management, sRGB or ANY color space is a meaningless concept. See:
sRGB urban legend & myths Part 2
In this 17 minute video, I'll discuss some more sRGB misinformation and cover:
When to use sRGB and what to expect on the web...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Search Result
Collapse
1124 results in 0.2601 seconds.
Keywords
Members
Tags
-
LaserSoft’s SilverFast will drive it and quite well!
https://www.silverfast.com/product/E...70-696/en.html
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, that's very possible. Epson installs profiles for papers it makes for many of it's printers but not all. But unlikely for that multipurpose printer. Here's what appears to be available:
https://www.epson.eu/viewcon/corpora...faq/1185/20140
Leave a comment:
-
If you have Epson papers, you can use the Epson supplied profiles for those papers and your printer. If not, you can't us them....
Leave a comment:
-
You should always test output using good color reference images designed for that task. The color reference images RGB values are such they are set for output and are editing and display agnostic. Test the output this way and examine for the same color issues so we know it's not your image specific...
Leave a comment:
-
Did you delete preferences?
Only shows if you save JPEG, not say TIFF?...
Leave a comment:
-
Not save in what way? Is there an error? Need a screen capture to see what's going on specifically.
You can always try resetting preferences, can't hurt.
Try trashing your Photoshop preferences. Press and hold Alt+Control+Shift (Windows) or Option+Command+Shift (Mac OS) immediately after...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Yes. The facts and physics of exposure; indeed settled.
You could attempt to understand the facts and physics behind what exposure is, where it takes place and attempt to understand that unless you're there with the photographer when he captures the image, and can understand how...
Leave a comment:
-
Here's a very good article from the RawDigger site about DR and how important ideal (optimized) exposure is to that attribute of image capture:
https://www.fastrawviewer.com/blog/h...of-your-camera
https://www.fastrawviewer.com/blog/d...-dynamic-range...
Leave a comment:
-
It must be horribly difficult for you to deal in the real world of exposing an image, but I'm not surprised by it. Obviously not trained to do so, or ever paid to do so professionally like some posting here....
Leave a comment:
-
No reason to do so, depending on the source data, a good way to introduce data loss and banding. And depending on what's selected for the Mode change, not going to produce the same results as simply staying in the original color space and desaturating everything....
Leave a comment:
-
Because there are as many 'photographers' as retouchers who are clueless about exposing, here's a little article I wrote for both who continue to be clueless about the subject and don't understand actual trained photographers don't under expose for anyone, let alone 'retouchers' but expose optimall...
Leave a comment:
-
Right, toning (like sepia) isn't intended to be neutral. And NONE of this in LR has anything to do with grayscale or gray gamma/dot gain. LR and ACR are 100% RGB engines. IF you wish to neutralize, then move saturation down to -100. Still RGB, no color cast. Then export from LR into whatever RGB working...
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, sure, why would you actually listen to a retoucher who hasn't a clue about exposing raw data. News flash, retouchers are not necessarily trained to make images. Some of us are both and know how to actually examine raw data to determine the exposure, which only takes place at capture and a by product...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: